## Background
`MinioStorage.Save` is called with `size = -1` on several paths,
including Actions logs, Actions artifacts, repository archives, avatars
and attachments. With an unknown size (-1) minio-go assumes a 5TiB
object and allocates a single part-sized buffer of 528MiB per upload,
regardless of the real payload size, which can exhaust the memory of
small instances.
Measured against a local S3 stub, five sequential uploads of a 4KiB
payload grew RSS by 1041MiB before the fix and by 34MiB after it.
## Fix
Pass an explicit 16MiB part size in that case, the same value minio-go
uses as minimum part size
(https://github.com/minio/minio-go/blob/v7.2.1/constants.go#L28).
Uploads with a known size are left untouched, since minio-go already
derives a part size proportional to the real object size.
## Note:
One behaviour change: with an unknown size the object is now limited to
16MiB * 10000 parts = 156.25GiB
(https://github.com/minio/minio-go/blob/v7.2.1/api-put-object-common.go#L112-L116).
`putObjectMultipartStreamNoLength` completes the upload once it runs out
of parts without checking that the reader was drained, so a stream past
that limit is silently truncated rather than rejected. The previous
limit was 5TiB. No payload Gitea uploads comes close to either.
Parts are also uploaded serially, so a smaller part size means
proportionally more round trips for large unknown-size uploads.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
`TestPullView_CodeOwner/First Pull Request` called
`PullRequestCodeOwnersReview` directly and asserted it returned one
notifier. That return value holds only the review requests that call
creates. But the push (by `files_service.ChangeRepoFiles`) to the PR
branch already triggers the same function asynchronously through
`AddTestPullRequestTask`, which makes `PullRequestCodeOwnersReview`
return an empty slice and the test then fails with
```
Error: "[]" should have 1 item(s), but has 0
```
Fix: make `require.Eventually` wait for the review request to exist.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
The handler of `/actions/runs/{run}/approve` doesn't check if the run is
already approved. If a run is re-approved, its jobs' status will be
reset to `StatusWaiting`, causing incorrect job status.
## Changes
### 1. Handle reusable workflow expansion failures
If a reusable workflow caller job is invalid (e.g. uses a workflow with
syntax error), the job emitter should mark it as failed instead of
retrying.
Related:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38518#discussion_r3608882095
### 2. No longer process concurrent run inline
**Before**: If a run(R1)'s status change unlocks another blocked run(R2)
via concurrency group, the job emitter will process R2 in R1's
transaction.
**Current**: No longer process R2 inline and emit the ID of R2 to let
another pass process it.
## How to reproduce this bug
1. Create a user with `visibility=public`
2. Update `ALLOWED_USER_VISIBILITY_MODES` setting to `limited, private`
3. Modify any field other than "User visibility" (e.g. "Full Name")
4. UI shows 500 error
## Fix
Only update the visibility field when it actually changes.
Follow #38237#38237 posts "skipped" commit statuses for every workflow that is not
triggered due to a filter (e.g. `paths` or `branches`) mismatch.
However, for non-required workflows, creating "skipped" commit statuses
for them would generate a lot of noise.
To address this issue, this PR adds a check before creating commit
status:
- For the context that matches any required status check patterns, a
"skipped" commit status will be created. The `Required` label can inform
users that this status check is required, but has been skipped because
of a filter mismatch.
- For a non-required context, nothing will be created.
NOTE: Reducing noise is a best-effort approach and isn't entirely
accurate. When creating commit statuses, it is impossible to predict
which branch protection rule will take effect. Therefore, we have to
compare the commit status context against the required patterns from all
rules. If any rule matches, the context is considered "required".
When a runner's `FetchTask` request context is cancelled after the job
is claimed but before the task reaches the runner (e.g. request
timeout), the job was left referencing a running task no runner ever
executes, so it stayed unpickable.
Fix: Check the context after assembling the task and release the task so
the job returns to waiting status for another runner.
`TestInitKeys` verified whether a host key file was regenerated by
comparing `os.FileInfo` before and after a `InitDefaultHostKeys` call.
On systems where the OS clock / filesystem timestamp granularity is
coarse, both writes land in the same tick and get an identical mtime.
The resulting `FileInfo` is then byte-for-byte equal even though the key
was actually regenerated, so `assert.NotEqual` fails.
Since a regenerated key always produces different random bytes,
comparing the content can reliably detect regeneration.
This PR adds the `gitea admin user disable-2fa` command to disable 2FA
for a user
When the only admin in the instance loses their 2FA credentials, this
command can be used to disable 2FA, allowing them to log in and reset
it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
## Summary
This PR adds **scoped workflows** to Gitea Actions. Workflows defined
centrally in a "source" repository that automatically run on every
repository in scope: an organization's repositories, or (for instance
admins) every repository on the instance. Each scoped run executes in
the consuming repository's own context (its runners, secrets, and
branch) while its content is read from the source repository, so an org
or instance can mandate shared CI across many repositories without
copying workflow files into each one.
An owner or instance admin registers source repositories on a settings
page and can mark individual workflows as **required**. A required
scoped workflow cannot be opted out by a consuming repository and gates
its pull-request merges; an optional one can be disabled per repository.
Scoped workflows live under a dedicated `SCOPED_WORKFLOW_DIRS` (default
`.gitea/scoped_workflows`), kept separate from regular `WORKFLOW_DIRS`.
## Main changes
### Configuration
New `SCOPED_WORKFLOW_DIRS` setting, validated to not overlap with
`WORKFLOW_DIRS`. Default: `.gitea/scoped_workflows`
### Data model & migration
- New `action_scoped_workflow_source` table mapping a registering owner
(`owner_id`, where `0` = instance-level) to a source repository, with a
per-workflow `WorkflowConfigs` map.
- `ActionRun` gains `WorkflowRepoID` / `WorkflowCommitSHA` (the pinned
content source) and an `IsScopedRun` flag.
### Detection & run creation
On consumer events, scoped workflows from the effective sources (the
owner's own sources plus instance-level ones) are matched and turned
into runs that execute in the consumer's context, with content pinned to
the source repo's default-branch commit.
`on: workflow_run` and `on: schedule` are currently not supported.
### Opt-out
A consuming repository can disable an optional scoped workflow (tracked
separately from regular `DisabledWorkflows`); required scoped workflows
can never be disabled, opted out, or bypassed.
### Commit status
A scoped run's status context format is `"<source repo full name>:
<workflow display name> / <job> (<event>)"`
(for example: `my-org/scoped-workflows: db-tests / test-sqlite
(pull_request)`),
keeping it distinct from a same-named repo-level workflow and from other
sources.
### Required status checks
Admins mark workflows required and supply status-check patterns.
`EffectiveRequiredContexts` appends those patterns to the branch
protection's required contexts and they are matched
must-present-and-pass. If the status checks from scoped workflows fail,
the PR cannot be merged.
NOTE: scoped workflows' required status checks patterns can protect any
target branch that has a protection rule, even though the rule's "Status
Check" is disabled. A target branch with no protection rule cannot be
protected.
<details>
<summary>Screenshots</summary>
<img width="1400" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a5d1db33-15ec-487e-93be-2bc04b4e6643"
/>
</details>
### Reusable workflows (`uses:`)
A scoped workflow's local `uses: ./...` resolves against the source
repository. `uses:` directory validation honors the
instance-configurable `WORKFLOW_DIRS` and `SCOPED_WORKFLOW_DIRS`
(previously hardcoded to `.gitea`/`.github/workflows`).
### Manual dispatch
`workflow_dispatch` is supported for scoped workflows (web and API),
resolving inputs/content from the source repo.
### Performance
A process-local LRU cache keyed by source repo ID for the per-source
workflow parse, so instance-level and owner-level sources don't open the
source repo and parse workflow files on every event.
### UI
Org / user / admin pages to register and remove sources, search
repositories, and mark workflows required with their status-check
patterns. The repository Actions sidebar groups scoped workflows by
source with owner/instance labels and required/disabled badges.
<details>
<summary>Screenshots</summary>
Scoped workflows setting page:
<img width="1600" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d19f667-97a5-4935-92b2-e53f105e3642"
/>
Consumer repo's Actions runs list:
<img width="1600" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a77241f9-0aa9-41aa-ba73-12a9a688cb64"
/>
- `Owner`: this is a owner-level scoped workflows source repo
- `Global`: this is a global scoped workflows source repo
- `Required`: this scoped workflow is required, repo admin cannot
disable it
</details>
---
Docs: https://gitea.com/gitea/docs/pulls/447
---------
Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
## Summary
This PR improves reusable workflow support for Gitea Actions. The
parsing of the called workflow now happens on Gitea side, not on the
runner. When the caller becomes ready, Gitea fetches the called workflow
source, parses it, and inserts each child job into the database as a
`ActionRunJob` linked to the caller via `ParentCallJobID`. As a result,
every callee job is dispatched as its own task and its logs surface as
an independent job entry in the UI, rather than being inlined into the
caller's "Set up job" step.
This PR supports two kinds of `uses` :
- same-repo call: `uses: ./.gitea/workflows/foo.yaml`
- cross-repo call: `uses: OWNER/REPO/.gitea/workflows/foo.yaml@REF`
## **⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️**
External reusable workflows (`uses:
https://other-gitea-instance/OWNER/REPO/.gitea/workflows/test.yaml@REF`)
are no longer supported. To keep using them, clone the repositories to
the local instance.
## Main changes
### Execution model
- Each caller job carries `IsReusableCaller=true` and won't be fetched
by runners.
- `ParentCallJobID` can link a called job to its caller.
- Caller status is derived from its direct children.
### Workflow syntax
- `jobparser` now supports parsing `on: workflow_call` trigger with
`inputs:`, `outputs:`, and `secrets:` declarations.
- **Max nesting depth**: capped at `MaxReusableCallLevels = 9`, which
means a top-level caller may have at most 9 nested callers below it.
- **Cycle prevention**: at expansion time, `checkCallerChain` walks the
caller's ancestor chain via `ParentCallJobID` and rejects if the same
`uses:` string appears anywhere upstream (`reusable workflow call cycle
detected`). This catches both direct (`A -> A`) and indirect (`A -> B ->
A`) cycles.
### Cross-repo access
- To share reusable workflows from private repos, use `Collaborative
Owners` introduced by #32562
### Rerun semantics
- `expandRerunJobIDs` partitions the latest attempt's jobs into:
- a **rerun set**: jobs being rerun + downstream siblings within the
same scope.
- an **ancestor set**: reusable callers whose only *some* descendants
are being rerun (the caller itself is not).
- Cloning behavior for callers in `execRerunPlan`:
- **Caller is fully rerun** (caller's `AttemptJobID` in `rerunSet`):
none of its descendants are cloned. The caller is cloned with
`IsCallerExpanded=false`, and re-expansion (which reinserts the children
fresh) happens later when the resolver brings the caller to `Waiting`
again.
- **Caller is in ancestor set** (only some descendants rerun): the
caller is pass-through (`Status` will be updated by its fresh children).
Its non-rerun descendants are also pass-through clones (point
`SourceTaskID` at the original task). Their `ParentCallJobID` is
remapped to the new attempt's caller row.
### UI
- Job list in `RepoActionView.vue` is now tree-shaped: callers indent
their children. Callers default to collapsed.
- New caller detail page using `WorkflowGraph` to show direct children
only; the run summary's `WorkflowGraph` shows top-level callers and
their immediate descendants.
### Known trade-offs
- **Caller expansion runs inside the enclosing write transaction.**
`expandReusableWorkflowCaller` performs a git read of the called
workflow while holding the row locks that update the caller and insert
its children. This is intentional: the caller-row update and child-row
inserts must commit atomically. None of the call sites is hot (each
caller is expanded once per attempt), so the trade-off is acceptable.
- **A malformed `if:` expression on a job leaves it `Blocked`
silently.** `evaluateJobIf` now runs server-side as part of resolver
passes; deterministic expression errors (typos, undefined context
fields) are logged but do not surface in the UI. This is the same
behavior the resolver already had for concurrency-expression errors.
Distinguishing transient DB errors from user-authored expression errors
and writing the latter back as `StatusFailure` is a follow-up.
#### Screenshots
<img width="1600" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bfaa9b7a-07e9-4127-8de9-a81f86e82828"
/>
<img width="1600" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8af109b3-ef28-4b53-aaad-d4632b923224"
/>
## References
-
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/reuse-automations/reuse-workflows
-
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/reusing-workflow-configurations
---
Replace #36388
---------
Signed-off-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Claude (Opus 4.7) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Background
`MAX_CREATION_LIMIT` applies to whoever owns a new repository, with no
distinction between individual users and organizations. Admins who want
different limits for the two - most commonly "block personal repos but
let orgs create freely" - currently have to set per-user / per-org
overrides on every entity.
## Changes
Adds two new `[repository]` settings:
- `USER_MAX_CREATION_LIMIT`: global limit for individual users
- `ORG_MAX_CREATION_LIMIT`: global limit for organizations
`MAX_CREATION_LIMIT` is kept as a shortcut: when set, it becomes the
default value for both new keys. When the new keys are explicitly
configured, they take precedence. Deployments that only set
`MAX_CREATION_LIMIT` see behavior identical to now.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Fix#36234
## Bug
Logs show `PrepareRunAndInsert: InsertRun: Error 1213: Deadlock found`,
which `handleWorkflows` silently swallows via `log.Error + continue`, so
the triggered run is dropped.
## Root cause
The path `UpdateRun -> UpdateRepoRunsNumbers` runs the following SQL
inside every status-changing transaction:
```sql
UPDATE repository
SET num_action_runs = (SELECT count(*) FROM action_run WHERE repo_id = N),
num_closed_action_runs = (SELECT count(*) FROM action_run WHERE repo_id = N AND status IN (...))
WHERE id = N;
```
On any DB that treats subqueries inside an UPDATE as locking reads, this
statement takes locks in two steps:
1. The outer UPDATE acquires an X lock on `repository[id=N]`
2. The embedded SELECT subqueries are evaluated as locking reads, taking
S locks on every `action_run` row matching `repo_id = N`
Two such concurrent transactions form a cycle via `repository[N]`:
| Tx | Holds | Wants | Blocked by |
|---|---|---|---|
| A: `PrepareRunAndInsert` (push trigger) | X on inserted `action_run`
row R_A; X on `repository[N]` (outer UPDATE already through step 1) | S
on `action_run` rows for repo N (subquery, step 2) | B's X lock on R_B |
| B: `UpdateTaskByState` (runner callback) | X on `action_run` row R_B
(from `UpdateRun`) | X on `repository[N]` (outer UPDATE, step 1) | A's X
lock on `repository[N]` |
| **Cycle** | A waits for R_B; B waits for `repository[N]` | | deadlock
error -> `handleWorkflows` swallows -> run lost |
PostgreSQL's MVCC reads do not take these locks and SQLite serializes
writers, so the symptom only surfaces on MySQL/MSSQL.
## Fix
Split `UpdateRepoRunsNumbers` into small SQLs to avoid locking reads and
move it out of DB transactions.
---------
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
This PR introduces a new `ActionRunAttempt` model and makes Actions
execution attempt-scoped.
**Main Changes**
- Each workflow run trigger generates a new `ActionRunAttempt`. The
triggered jobs are then associated with this new `ActionRunAttempt`
record.
- Each rerun now creates:
- a new `ActionRunAttempt` record for the workflow run
- a full new set of `ActionRunJob` records for the new
`ActionRunAttempt`
- For jobs that need to be rerun, the new job records are created as
runnable jobs in the new attempt.
- For jobs that do not need to be rerun, new job records are still
created in the new attempt, but they reuse the result of the previous
attempt instead of executing again.
- Introduce `rerunPlan` to manage each rerun and refactored rerun flow
into a two-phase plan-based model:
- `buildRerunPlan`
- `execRerunPlan`
- `RerunFailedWorkflowRun` and `RerunFailed` no longer directly derives
all jobs that need to be rerun; this step is now handled by
`buildRerunPlan`.
- Converted artifacts from run-scoped to attempt-scoped:
- uploads are now associated with `RunAttemptID`
- listing, download, and deletion resolve against the current attempt
- Added attempt-aware web Actions views:
- the default run page shows the latest attempt
(`/actions/runs/{run_id}`)
- previous attempt pages show jobs and artifacts for that attempt
(`/actions/runs/{run_id}/attempts/{attempt_num}`)
- New APIs:
- `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/runs/{run}/attempts/{attempt}`
- `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/runs/{run}/attempts/{attempt}/jobs`
- New configuration `MAX_RERUN_ATTEMPTS`
- https://gitea.com/gitea/docs/pulls/383
**Compatibility**
- Existing legacy runs use `LatestAttemptID = 0` and legacy jobs use
`RunAttemptID = 0`. Therefore, these fields can be used to identify
legacy runs and jobs and provide backward compatibility.
- If a legacy run is rerun, an `ActionRunAttempt` with `attempt=1` will
be created to represent the original execution. Then a new
`ActionRunAttempt` with `attempt=2` will be created for the real rerun.
- Existing artifact records are not backfilled; legacy artifacts
continue to use `RunAttemptID = 0`.
**Improvements**
- It is now easier to inspect and download logs from previous attempts.
-
[`run_attempt`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/contexts#github-context)
semantics are now aligned with GitHub.
- > A unique number for each attempt of a particular workflow run in a
repository. This number begins at 1 for the workflow run's first
attempt, and increments with each re-run.
- Rerun behavior is now clearer and more explicit.
- Instead of mutating the status of previous jobs in place, each rerun
creates a new attempt with a full new set of job records.
- Artifacts produced by different reruns can now be listed separately.
Signed-off-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This PR adds an External ID Claim Name configuration field to the OIDC
auth source. When set, Gitea uses the specified JWT claim as the user's
`ExternalID` instead of the default `sub` claim.
This PR fixes the bug when migrating from Azure AD V2 to OIDC. When an
admin migrates the same auth source to OIDC, goth's `openidConnect`
provider defaults to using the `sub` claim as `UserID`. However, Azure
AD's `sub` is a pairwise identifier:
> `sub`: The subject is a pairwise identifier and is unique to an
application ID. If a single user signs into two different apps using two
different client IDs, those apps receive two different values for the
subject claim.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity-platform/id-token-claims-reference#payload-claims
As a result, every existing user appears as a new account after
migration.
To fix this issue, Gitea should use `oid` claim for `UserID`.
> `oid`: This ID uniquely identifies the user across applications - two
different applications signing in the same user receives the same value
in the oid claim.
Note: The `oid` claim is not included in Azure AD tokens by default. The
`profile` scope must be added to the Scopes field of the auth source.
Changes:
- Make `GetActionWorkflow` only convert the target workflow
- In `getActionWorkflowEntry`, use `branchName` instead of resolving the
default branch name from `commit.GetBranchName()`
- Add `ref` to `workflow_run` notify input to avoid the empty `ref`
warning
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Follow up #36842
Migration `326` can be prohibitively slow on large instances because it
scans and rewrites all commit status target URLs generated by Gitea
Actions in the database. This PR refactors migration `326` to perform a
partial update instead of rewriting every legacy target URL. The reason
for this partial rewrite is that **smaller legacy run/job indexes are
the most likely to be ambiguous with run/job ID-based URLs** during
runtime resolution, so this change prioritizes that subset while
avoiding the cost of rewriting all legacy records.
To preserve access to old links, this PR introduces
`resolveCurrentRunForView` to handle both ID-based URLs and index-based
URLs:
- For job pages (`/actions/runs/{run}/jobs/{job}`), it first tries to
confirm that the URL is ID-based. It does so by checking whether `{job}`
can be treated as an existing job ID in the repository and whether that
job belongs to `{run}`. If that match cannot be confirmed, it falls back
to treating the URL as legacy `run index + job index`, resolves the
corresponding run and job, and redirects to the correct ID-based URL.
- When both ID-based and index-based interpretations are valid at the
same time, the resolver **prefers the ID-based interpretation by
default**. For example, if a repository contains one run-job pair
(`run_id=3, run_index=2, job_id=4`), and also another run-job pair
(`run_id=1100, run_index=3, job_id=1200, job_index=4`), then
`/actions/runs/3/jobs/4` is ambiguous. In that case, the resolver treats
it as the ID-based URL by default and shows the page for `run_id=3,
job_id=4`. Users can still explicitly force the legacy index-based
interpretation with `?by_index=1`, which would resolve the same URL to
`/actions/runs/1100/jobs/1200`.
- For run summary pages (`/actions/runs/{run}`), it uses a best-effort
strategy: by default it first treats `{run}` as a run ID, and if no such
run exists in the repository, it falls back to treating `{run}` as a
legacy run index and redirects to the ID-based URL. Users can also
explicitly force the legacy interpretation with `?by_index=1`.
- This summary-page compatibility is best-effort, not a strict ambiguity
check. For example, if a repository contains two runs: runA (`id=7,
index=3`) and runB (`id=99, index=7`), then `/actions/runs/7` will
resolve to runA by default, even though the old index-based URL
originally referred to runB.
The table below shows how valid legacy index-based target URLs are
handled before and after migration `326`. Lower-range legacy URLs are
rewritten to ID-based URLs, while higher-range legacy URLs remain
unchanged in the database but are still handled correctly by
`resolveCurrentRunForView` at runtime.
| run_id | run_index | job_id | job_index | old target URL | updated by
migration 326 | current target URL | can be resolved correctly |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | `/user2/repo2/actions/runs/2/jobs/1` | true |
`/user2/repo2/actions/runs/3/jobs/4` | true |
| 4 | 3 | 8 | 4 | `/user2/repo2/actions/runs/3/jobs/4` | true |
`/user2/repo2/actions/runs/4/jobs/8` | true (without migration 326, this
URL will resolve to run(`id=3`)) |
| 80 | 20 | 170 | 0 | `/user2/repo2/actions/runs/20/jobs/0` | true |
`/user2/repo2/actions/runs/80/jobs/170` | true |
| 1500 | 900 | 1600 | 0 | `/user2/repo2/actions/runs/900/jobs/0` | false
| `/user2/repo2/actions/runs/900/jobs/0` | true |
| 2400 | 1500 | 2600 | 0 | `/user2/repo2/actions/runs/1500/jobs/0` |
false | `/user2/repo2/actions/runs/1500/jobs/0` | true |
| 2400 | 1500 | 2601 | 1 | `/user2/repo2/actions/runs/1500/jobs/1` |
false | `/user2/repo2/actions/runs/1500/jobs/1` | true |
For users who already ran the old migration `326`, this change has no
functional impact. Their historical URLs are already stored in the
ID-based form, and ID-based URLs continue to resolve correctly.
For users who have not run the old migration `326`, only a subset of
legacy target URLs will now be rewritten during upgrade. This avoids the
extreme runtime cost of the previous full migration, while all remaining
legacy target URLs continue to work through the web-layer compatibility
logic.
Many thanks to @wxiaoguang for the suggestions.
This PR fixes `notifyWorkflowJobStatusUpdate` to send
`WorkflowRunStatusUpdate` for each affected workflow run instead of only
the first run in the input job list.
This PR migrates the web Actions run/job routes from index-based
`runIndex` or `jobIndex` to database IDs.
**⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️**: Existing saved links/bookmarks that use the old
index-based URLs will no longer resolve after this change.
Improvements of this change:
- Previously, `jobIndex` depended on list order, making it hard to
locate a specific job. Using `jobID` provides stable addressing.
- Web routes now align with API, which already use IDs.
- Behavior is closer to GitHub, which exposes run/job IDs in URLs.
- Provides a cleaner base for future features without relying on list
order.
- #36388 this PR improves the support for reusable workflows. If a job
uses a reusable workflow, it may contain multiple child jobs, which
makes relying on job index to locate a job much more complicated
---------
Signed-off-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
In #32562, I incorrectly assigned mismatched `repo_id` values to the
`action_run` and `action_run_job` fixtures used in
`TestActionsCollaborativeOwner`. The changes introduced in #36173 will
cause the test to fail. This PR removes the incorrect fixtures and
switches to using mock workflows to test the relevant functionality.
Partially fix#34710
The bug described in #34710 can be divided into two parts: `push.paths`
and `pull_request.paths`. This PR fixes the issue related to
`pull_request.paths`. The root cause is that the check for whether the
workflow can be triggered happens **before** updating the PR’s merge
base. This causes the file-change detection to use the old merge base.
Therefore, we need to update the merge base first and then check whether
the workflow can be triggered.
#35783 fixes an actions rerun bug. Due to this bug, some runs may be
incorrectly marked as `StatusWaiting` even though all the jobs are in
done status. These runs cannot be run or cancelled. This PR adds a new
doctor command to fix the inconsistent run status.
```
gitea doctor check --run fix-actions-unfinished-run-status --fix
```
Thanks to @ChristopherHX for the test.
This PR moves "no online runner" warning to the runs list.
A job's `runs-on` may contain expressions like `runs-on: [self-hosted,
"${{ inputs.chosen-os }}"]` so the value of `runs-on` may be different
in each run. We cannot check it through the workflow file.
<details>
<summary>Screenshots</summary>
Before:
<img width="960" alt="3d2a91746271d8b1f12c8f7d20eba550"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a972c50-db97-49d2-b12b-c1a439732a11"
/>
After:
<img width="960" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fc076e0e-bd08-4afe-99b9-c0eb0fd2c7e7"
/>
</details>
This PR also splits `prepareWorkflowDispatchTemplate` function into 2
functions:
- `prepareWorkflowTemplate` get and check all of the workflows
- `prepareWorkflowDispatchTemplate` only prepare workflow dispatch
config for `workflow_dispatch` workflows.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR adds a quick approve button on PR page to allow reviewers to
approve all pending checks. Only users with write permission to the
Actions unit can approve.
---------
Signed-off-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fix#34504
Since one required context can match more than one commit statuses, we
should not directly compare the lengths of `requiredCommitStatuses` and
`requiredContexts`
---------
Signed-off-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
In the old `pickTask`, when getting secrets or variables failed, the
task could get stuck in the `running` status (task status is `running`
but the runner did not fetch the task). To fix this issue, these steps
should be in one transaction.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Move the main logic of `generateTaskContext` and `findTaskNeeds` to the
`services` layer.
This is a part of #32751, since we need the git context and `needs` to
parse the concurrency expressions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fix#32795
If a job uses a matrix, multiple `ActionRunJobs` may have the same
`JobID`. We need to merge the outputs of these jobs to make them
available to the jobs that need them.
Resolve#30350
The action unit of mirrors and templates should be disabled by default.
This PR adds `DEFAULT_MIRROR_REPO_UNITS` and
`DEFAULT_TEMPLATE_REPO_UNITS` options to allow users to specify default
units for mirrors and templates.
Thanks to @lng2020 for the
[idea](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30350#issuecomment-2053942243)
These settings can allow users to only display the repositories explore page.
Thanks to yp05327 and wxiaoguang !
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fix#31395
This regression is introduced by #30273. To find out how GitHub handles
this case, I did [some
tests](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/31395#issuecomment-2278929115).
I use redirect in this PR instead of checking if the corresponding `.md`
file exists when rendering the link because GitHub also uses redirect.
With this PR, there is no need to resolve the raw wiki link when
rendering a wiki page. If a wiki link points to a raw file, access will
be redirected to the raw link.
Fix#26685
If a commit status comes from Gitea Actions and the user cannot access
the repo's actions unit (the user does not have the permission or the
actions unit is disabled), a 404 page will occur after clicking the
"Details" link. We should hide the "Details" link in this case.
<img
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15528715/68361714-b784-4bb5-baab-efde4221f466"
width="400px" />
Fix#31599
A branch divergence is counted based on the default branch. If the
default branch is updated, all divergence caches of the repo need to be
deleted.
Fix#25897Fix#30322#29464 cannot handle some complex `if` conditions correctly because it
only checks `always()` literally. In fact, it's not easy to evaluate the
`if` condition on the Gitea side because evaluating it requires a series
of contexts. But act_runner is able to evaluate the `if` condition
before running the job (for more information, see
[`gitea/act`](https://gitea.com/gitea/act/src/commit/517d11c67126bd97c88e2faabda0832fff482258/pkg/runner/run_context.go#L739-L753))
. So we can use act_runner to check the `if` condition.
In this PR, how to handle a blocked job depends on its `needs` and `if`:
- If not all jobs in `needs` completed successfully and the job's `if`
is empty, set the job status to `StatusSkipped`
- In other cases, the job status will be set to `StatusWaiting`, and
then act_runner will check the `if` condition and run the job if the
condition is met
Fix#28761Fix#27884Fix#28093
## Changes
### Rerun all jobs
When rerun all jobs, status of the jobs with `needs` will be set to
`blocked` instead of `waiting`. Therefore, these jobs will not run until
the required jobs are completed.
### Rerun a single job
When a single job is rerun, its dependents should also be rerun, just
like GitHub does
(https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28761#issuecomment-2008620820).
In this case, only the specified job will be set to `waiting`, its
dependents will be set to `blocked` to wait the job.
### Show warning if every job has `needs`
If every job in a workflow has `needs`, all jobs will be blocked and no
job can be run. So I add a warning message.
<img
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15528715/88f43511-2360-465d-be96-ee92b57ff67b"
width="480px" />
1. Fix incorrect `HookEventType` for issue-related events in
`IssueChangeAssignee`
2. Add `case "types"` in the `switch` block in `matchPullRequestEvent`
to avoid warning logs
Fix#14459
The following users can add/remove review requests of a PR
- the poster of the PR
- the owner or collaborators of the repository
- members with read permission on the pull requests unit
Fix#29175
Replace #29207
This PR makes some improvements to the `issue_comment` workflow trigger
event.
1. Fix the bug that pull requests cannot trigger `issue_comment`
workflows
2. Previously the `issue_comment` event only supported the `created`
activity type. This PR adds support for the missing `edited` and
`deleted` activity types.
3. Some events (including `issue_comment`, `issues`, etc. ) only trigger
workflows that belong to the workflow file on the default branch. This
PR introduces the `IsDefaultBranchWorkflow` function to check for these
events.
In #28691, schedule plans will be deleted when a repo's actions unit is
disabled. But when the unit is enabled, the schedule plans won't be
created again.
This PR fixes the bug. The schedule plans will be created again when the
actions unit is re-enabled
Fixes#28699
This PR implements the `MigrateRepository` method for `actionsNotifier`
to detect the schedules from the workflow files in the migrated
repository.
