Fixes an issue where users could not commit changes on a file which is
unprotected.
Fixes: #37655
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
- Introduce a “Bypass Protection Allowlist” on branch rules
(users/teams) alongside admins, with BlockAdminMergeOverride
still respected.
- Surface the allowlist in API (create/edit options, structs) and
settings UI; merge box now shows the red button +
message for bypass-capable users.
- Apply bypass logic to merge checks and pre-receive so allowlisted
users can override unmet approvals/status checks/
protected files when force-merging.
- Add migration for new columns, locale strings, and unit tests (bypass
helper; queue test tweak).
<img width="1069" height="218" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0b61bc2a-a27f-47f3-a923-613688008e65"
/>
Fixes#36476
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Codex GPT-5.3 <codex@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: GPT-5.2 <noreply@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude (Opus 4.7) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Summary
When comparing branches with **no common merge base** (e.g. unrelated
histories or orphan branches), `PageIsComparePull` is false and
`CommitCount` is zero. The compare template still showed
`repo.commits.nothing_to_compare`, which in German reads like the
branches are identical—even though the flash already explains there is
no merge base.
## Changes
- **`templates/repo/diff/compare.tmpl`**: Only render the grey “nothing
to compare” segment when `CompareInfo.CompareBase` is set.
<img width="1962" height="564"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/adc3b4a0-6f03-45da-b297-e15e5ad0aa79"
/>
Fixes#37642
---------
Signed-off-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
When a workflow job failed, the API response reported all steps as
failed — even steps that had completed successfully before the failing
step. `ToActionWorkflowJob` was calling `ToActionsStatus(job.Status)`
for every step instead of `ToActionsStatus(step.Status)`, so the job's
overall conclusion was propagated to each step.
Each `ActionTaskStep` has its own `Status` field that tracks the actual
outcome of that step independently of the job result.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
fixes adding collaborative owners in Actions settings when the user or
organization name contains capital letters.
Fixes#37548
---------
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
## Summary
- Enforce **Conventional Commits** on PR titles (PRs are squash-merged,
so the PR title becomes the final commit message).
- Add a local `make lint-pr-title` target so contributors can validate
titles before pushing.
## Why
We squash-merge PRs, which means the final repository history is largely
shaped by **PR titles**. Enforcing a consistent Conventional Commits
format makes:
- **Release notes & changelogs easier to generate** (types like `feat` /
`fix` can be grouped automatically).
- **History easier to scan** (uniform structure, optional scopes,
explicit breaking changes via `!`).
- **Automation more reliable** (future tooling can infer category and
scope from the title).
## PR title format
```text
type(scope)!: subject
type: one of build|chore|ci|docs|feat|fix|perf|refactor|revert|style|test
scope: optional (e.g. web, api, actions, repo, …)
!: optional, indicates a breaking change
subject: short, imperative, no trailing period
```
## Examples
```text
feat(web): add dark mode toggle
fix(api): avoid panic when repo is missing
chore(ci): lint PR titles with commitlint
refactor(templates): reduce duplication in repo list rendering
feat!: remove legacy OAuth endpoint
```
## Local testing
```text
make deps-frontend
make lint-pr-title PR_TITLE="feat(web): add dark mode toggle"
```
---------
Signed-off-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: nb <nb@users.noreply.local>
Co-authored-by: GPT-5.2 <gpt-5.2@openai.com>
If a workflow is not in default branch the hooks could not be detected
Fixes#37169
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
`url.PathEscape` unnecessarily encodes ! to %21, causing Matrix
homeservers to reject the request with 401. Replace %21 back to ! after
escaping.
Fixes#36012
---------
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR updates `CONTRIBUTING.md` for clarity (code review, maintainers,
PR workflow)
## Suggestion
- majors about every **three months**, with a more predictable cadence
from **v1.26** onward.
- target dates such as **v1.26.0** (April 2026), **v1.27.0** (June
2026), **v1.28.0** (September 2026), **v1.29.0** (December 2026).
- announce feature freeze **two weeks** before each release.
## Other doc changes
- Reviewing PRs: separate guidance for reviewers vs authors; small edits
to maintaining PRs, merge queue, commit messages, co-authors.
- Maintainers: clearer subsections; links to GitHub Docs for 2FA / GPG.
- Split the Contributing.md into more useful markdown files
---------
Signed-off-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
`model.ReadWorkflow` succeeds for YAML that is syntactically valid but
fails deeper parsing in `jobparser.Parse` (e.g. blank lines inside `run:
|` blocks cause a SetJob round-trip error). Add
`ValidateWorkflowContent` which runs the full `jobparser.Parse` to catch
these cases, and use it in the file view, the actions workflow list, and
the workflow detection loop so users see the error instead of silently
getting a 500 or a dropped workflow.
Fixes#37115
Signed-off-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
`LoadSettingsForInstall` only ran `loadMailerFrom`, not
_loadRegisterMailFrom_ or _loadNotifyMailFrom_, so
Service.RegisterEmailConfirm and Service.EnableNotifyMail were never
read from app.ini on the install page.
Full startup runs those through loadMailsFrom; the install path was a
narrower subset and never included that step—an oversight from when
install-specific loading was added
Fixes#37112
Workflow run, job, task, and step durations could show **negative**
values (e.g. `-50s`) when `Stopped` was missing, zero (epoch), or
**before** `Started` (clock skew, races, reruns). The UI used
`calculateDuration` with no validation.
This change:
- Uses each row`s **Updated** timestamp as a **fallback end time** when
`Stopped` is invalid but the status is terminal, so duration
approximates elapsed time instead of `0s` or a negative.
- Keeps **`ActionRun.Duration()`** clamped to **≥ 0** when
`PreviousDuration` plus the current segment would still be negative
(legacy bad data).
Fixes#34582.
Co-authored-by: Composer <composer@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Add an optional Name field to webhooks so users can give them
human-readable labels instead of relying only on URLs. The webhook
overview page now displays names when available, or falls back to the
URL for unnamed webhooks.
Fixes#37025
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Treat Commit Status Warnings as errors
> The root problem is that the definition of "warning" are different
across systems.
>
> * Sometimes, "warning" is treated as "acceptable" (Gitea 1.25)
> * Sometimes, "warning" is mapped from "Result.UNSTABLE", which means
"there are test failures" and it is "failure" in Gitea
>
> **To avoid breaking existing users, the best choice is to revert the
behavior on Gitea side: treat "warning" as "error".**
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/37042#issuecomment-4158231611
fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/37042
---------
Signed-off-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
With Gitea 1.25.4 the workflow event for in_progress was not triggered
for Gitea Actions.
Fixes#36906
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
I tried to tighten the AI contribution policy and make the expectations
around AI-assisted submissions clearer.
---------
Signed-off-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Use shared repo permission resolution for Actions task users in issue
label remove and clear paths, and add a regression test for deleting
issue labels with a Gitea Actions token.
This fixes issue label deletion when the request is authenticated with a
Gitea Actions token.
Fixes#37011
The bug was that the delete path re-resolved repository permissions
using the normal user permission helper, which does not handle Actions
task users. As a result, `DELETE
/api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/labels/{id}` could return
`500` for Actions tokens even though label listing and label addition
worked.
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <codex@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
When the email field was submitted as empty in org settings (web and
API), the previous guard `if form.Email != ""` silently skipped the
update, making it impossible to remove a contact email after it was set.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Move UserDisabledFeatures context data into a shared SettingsCtxData
middleware for the /user/settings route group, so it is set consistently
on all pages (including Notifications, Actions, etc.) instead of only on
the handlers that remembered to set it individually.
Fixes#36954
Hey, I bumped Go to 1.26.1 and fixed a couple of things I ran into while
poking around.
### Changes
- Bump go.mod from 1.26.0 to 1.26.1 (security patch)
- Bump golangci-lint from v2.10.1 to v2.11.2
- Run make tidy, fmt, lint-go
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Claude (Opus 4.6) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This PR adds official REST API endpoints to rerun Gitea Actions workflow
runs and individual jobs:
* POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/runs/{run}/rerun
* POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/runs/{run}/jobs/{job_id}/rerun
It reuses the existing rerun behavior from the web UI and exposes it
through stable API routes.
---------
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
I was testing typos-cli and fixed some misspelled wording here.
All changes are internal — no public API fields, database columns,
locale keys, or migration names are affected.
The banner allows site operators to communicate important announcements
(e.g., maintenance windows, policy updates, service notices) directly
within the UI.
The maintenance mode only allows admin to access the web UI.
* Fix#2345
* Fix#9618
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
## Problem
`GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/runs/{runId}/jobs` was always
returning `steps: null` for each job.
## Cause
In `convert.ToActionWorkflowJob`, when the job had a `TaskID` we loaded
the task with `db.GetByID` but never loaded `task.Steps`.
`ActionTask.Steps` is not stored in the task row (`xorm:"-"`); it comes
from `action_task_step` and is only filled by `task.LoadAttributes()` /
`GetTaskStepsByTaskID()`. So the conversion loop over `task.Steps`
always saw nil and produced no steps in the API response.
## Solution
After resolving the task (by ID when the caller passes `nil`), we now
load its steps with `GetTaskStepsByTaskID(ctx, task.ID)` and set
`task.Steps` before building the API steps slice. No other behavior is
changed.
## Testing
- New integration test `TestAPIListWorkflowRunJobsReturnsSteps`: calls
the runs/{runId}/jobs endpoint, inserts a task step for a fixture job,
and asserts that the response includes non-null, non-empty `steps` with
the expected step data.
- `make test-sqlite#TestAPIListWorkflowRunJobsReturnsSteps` passes with
this fix.
---------
Co-authored-by: Manav <mdave0905@gmail.com>
